Introduction
I
have been a Microsoft .NET developer since .NET came out as Beta back
in late 2000 and Visual Basic developer before that. Over the past
fifteen years I came across many languages and technologies that pose
challenge to .NET and its development framework. They were good but
usually they were good in one particular aspect and again at some level
you have to fall back to IIS or .NET framework for other features. I am
not claiming that over the past fifteen years there was no language or
technology that did all what .NET does. They might have done all but
they were not as good as .NET or in some cases the development
environment was not as easy to use as Visual Studio.
And then came Google's Dart
As
I mentioned in my intro that .NET provided a complete solution for most
of the programming projects. That meant that in some cases we as
developers had to work through some of the challenges that .NET
framework posed. I always looked for a language that would be close
enough to C# and at the same time development would be easy in it should
provide a complete solution and not just one aspect.
Elephant in the room
Let us talk about the elephant in the room first. By the elephant in the room, I mean the following:
1. Dart is not even supported by Chrome
At
the time of writing this article, the Google's chrome does not support
dart in its default setting. But there is a version of Google Chrome
called Chromium that does come with Dart support. You can visit
https://www.dartlang.org/docs/dart-up-and-running/contents/ch04-tools-dartium.html
for further details.
2. Why not just use java script?
Google
has been improving java script for a long time. Java script has come a
long way. The fastest java script engine that I am aware of is called
V8. Having said that Java script has some language features that put
Java script in some disadvantage. If not disadvantage then at least
cause the slowness. Google's dart language has language features that
allow it be faster than javascript. Just that alone is an advantage that
makes a whole lot of sense when thinking about scalable mobile
applications. Also, let us say you use dartToJs to convert dart code to
Java script. That too is faster than traditional java script.
| Screen shot from : https://www.dartlang.org/performance/ |
3. What about the Google's Go programming language?
This
one is a tough one. Per my knowledge Google's Go language or golang was
developed to make programmers more productive. So it means it is not a
language comparable to C# or VB but a language to fix a part of problem.
I do not think that if I should invest time and energy in learning
golang. If you compare that with Dart then dart appears to be more
general purpose and more evolved than golang.
4. What about jQuery?
If you take
the evolution of a language as a factor then jQuery seems to be quite
evolved. Google Dart seems to have been "inspired" by many features of
jQuery if you go through some development using Dart. With all the good
stuff that jQuery does, underneath that it is essentially java script.
So the same disadvantages Also, if jQuery would have been filling all
the gaps that java script has then I do not think Google dart would have
been developed.
So since I have explained the negative things that are said about Google's Dart language, I can now talk about the good stuff.
Amazing Dart Features
Now let us talk about the aspects that makes language of choice for modern web apps.
Scalable Web app development:
When
the dart was being developed, it appears that only the 'good parts' of
other languages like 'C#' and 'Java script' were taken into
consideration. At the same time the 'bad parts' of the other languages
were avoided. What resulted is a language that is highly tuned for
scalable web application development. Here is one example:
import 'dart:math' as math;
import 'dart:convert' show JSON;
The
above two examples show a feature that is quite amazing. What it does
is that it enables a program to include a particular library but not all
of what is present in a library. It allows select part of library that
your program would be concerned with. Imagine the situation where
System.Web in .NET. The system.web is a huge a library about 8 megs. In
ASP.NET we use system.web a lot but we do not need all the features of
system.web. What ends up happening is that the application becomes
bloated.
So
language features as one mentioned above allow us developers to create
scalable web applications using Google's dart language.
Mobile development:
Like
or not more and more applications are being developed for mobile. Which
means that more and more of the logic is being sent on the browser end
and less of running the logic at the server side. This is pushing the
envelop on web development. You do not have much memory at the same time
you cannot rely on chatty architecture as mobile environment is not
always available with internet (that is why SPA "Single page
application" gained popularity). So what it means that you want to
provide rich experience to users but not rely on heavy web controls.
Dart fills this gap very well. It is robust like jQuery for provided
rich experience at the same time it is fully refined language as C#.
Language feels like C#:
Why this
is an amazing language feature? That is because most of the .NET
developers including me love C#. So when you see a language similar to
C# then you feel at home and learning curve does not seems intimidating.
Let us say if the dart's syntax was very different from C# then for me
personally it would have been a major turn off or I had to prepare
myself for steep learning curve. Now let us see some of the examples
where dart language feels like C#.
Server side programming:
This is huge. We have been living in a web echo system where UI logic was written in different language then middle tier logic or the back-end logic. Example, a web site that has front end developed using jQuery or Java script, talking to a web service that is written using C#. That certainly meant that you have to have expertise in both languages in order to produce an excellent result. Which often meant two different types of developers.With dart you can have a developer who is expert for both back-end and front-end developer. There is an interesting analogy that helps explain this. In the world of military aviation, those air force who have more variety of aircraft are considered less efficient than those who have less variety. This is because for more variety you have to have more skill personal in different technology who translates into more expensive maintenance.
In my next few blogs I will share my experience and knowledge with regards to dart.
No comments:
Post a Comment